| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Executive Board ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Executive Board
''Howard Johnson Co v Detroit Local Joint Executive Board'', is a US labor law case that decided that under the Labor Management Relations Act § 301 there can be no obligation on an employer to collectively bargain with employees of a business that has been transferred to him.
==Facts==
The Howard Johnson Co bought the assets of a restaurant and motor lodge from the Grissoms family that had been running the lodge on its behalf as a franchise. The Grissoms retained the real property and leased it to Howard, and Howard expressly did not assume any of the Grissoms’ obligations, including those under a collective agreement. Howard hired 45 of its own staff, but only 9 of the Grissoms’ 53 employees and none of the supervisors. The union, the Detroit Local Joint Executive Board, said this was a ‘lockout’ in violation of the Labor Management Relations Act §301, by not hiring all Grissoms’ employees back. It sought an injunction for Howard to arbitrate.
The District Court held that Howard was required to arbitrate, but not that all the employees had to be hired back. The Court of Appeal affirmed.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Executive Board」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|